Overview Of Gun Laws In The United States

Gun Laws
Share

Introduction

In the following essay the information related to the laws which the US maintained in the country to develop the environment and to maintain a peaceful place. It will provide the information regarding various activities which are followed by the people of the US before purchasing the gun to keep with them. The information regarding how the president of the country stops the people who are guilty of owning guns. There are acts which the governemnt implement within the country to reduce the rate of murder in the country. The information regarding how FFL provides licenses to the owners of the guns after checking the background of the individual. The FFL also checks whether the individual is needed a gun or not. The information related to the laws which the government of the US followed will also be enumerated in the below-discussed essay. It will also portray the information regarding the period when the laws were amended and how it supports the country to develop its peacefulness. The information regarding how many people were died in the year 2017 will also be provided in the essay and it will also enumerate that the usage of guns without any reason results in a huge rate of murder. It will also provide information regarding the age limit when an individual can purchase a gun and can use it for their personal use. In many cases, people use their guns in a domestic fight the information regarding this will also be enumerated in the below-discussed essay. The essay will also provide information regarding the NFA and FFA who discuss the gun-keeping laws in the country. According to the US, gun keeping is not a big issue the government permitted that every citizen in the country can keep a gun with them and can use it for any purpose to protect them. 

Overview Of Gun Laws In The United States

In America, every citizen of the country can keep a gun with them to protect them from any dangerous situation. Every citizen has the right to carry one gun with them. Assignment writer said, The adults are permitted to carry guns with them. It is derived that when the country was founded it was written in the constitution that every adult can carry a gun with them for their safety. It is their basic rules to carry guns with them. It is also discussed in the rules that if an adult is convicted criminal or has mental health illness will not get permission to keep guns with them for their safety (Hufbauer, & Globerman, 2018). If an adult is not a citizen of the US then they also don’t have permission to keep guns with them. These rules were established by the US government in the year 1971 from then it is defined that every adult in the US can keep guns with them. It is also defined that every state in the US has different rules regarding the keeping agreement of guns with them. In the state of Nevada people, can reveals to anyone that they use guns. It is maintained strictly in that state. The people of that state are much concerned that they will not reveal to anyone that they keep guns with them. It is also defined that the people in the UK have different rules regarding keeping guns with them (Collins, et.al. 2018). They do not have fundamental rights to keep guns with them. The people of the UK cannot keep the guns with them if they do not receive permission from the police. The license of keeping gun is mandatory for the people of the UK. It is also checked by the police that whether the person is needed the gun or not then only the individual receives the license of the gun. According to the research of  online coursework help it has been identified that the government of America needs to change the rules as this will reduce the rate of death in the country and the government must restrict the dangerous people from owning guns because it increases the rate of death and due to that the country faces a huge problem. Barack Obama derived that guns need to be banned as the rate of death will be reduced (Rocque, & Duwe, 2018). In April 2017, Donald Trump discussed that every individual in the country can keep guns with them. He also derived that the people can use guns for their protection.

The gun control act of 1968 also defined that people who are of 18 years can purchase guns for their use (Sacco, 2019). The guns which they can purchase are shotguns, rifles, and ammunition. The handguns can only be purchased by people who are of 21 years. It needs to be observed that state or local it is also derived in the rules of the US that the individual who is mentally disabled cannot get the license to keep guns with them as they can attack the people without any reason. It is also mentioned in the laws of the government that people with prior felony convictions that if the prison exceeds more than one year and the person who is misdemeanors carrying sentences more than two years will not get the permission for the license of keeping guns with them as the society discussed that they are not suitable for the society as they can use guns in any cases and this may increase the rate of deaths in the country (Díez, et.al. 2017). It is also mentioned in the federal laws that the person who is guilty and performed unlawful activities within the country will not get permission to keep guns with them as this will be very dangerous for the country. People who are tourists and the individuals who dishonorably discharged military personnel will not receive the license from the government. The people who threaten and perform harassment activities within the country will also not receive permission to keep guns with them. The individuals must receive the license from the ATF otherwise they will be arrested if found with guns in public places (Bjelopera, 2017). The ATF verifies the records of the individual and then provides the license to keep gums with them to protect themselves from dangerous areas. It is also derived that the handguns owners must have the age of 21 years to use the guns. They must have federal firearms license (FFL). They also must not have names in the area of mental and convictions otherwise they will also not receive the license of keeping the guns with them. Plagiarism free essay help professional have also identified that the price of making the license is $200 for the tenure of three years and $90 is needed every year to renew the license. The payment of the guns is made online and then it is shipped to the FFL holders and then the person who is the FFL holder makes the necessary checking before handing it to the final customer (Katsiyannis, Whitford, & Ennis, 2018). The FFL holders also check the background of the people who purchase the guns and they also reveal that they need to follow the laws and regulations while using the guns. Online assignment writer also defined in federal law that the person who sells the guns with the motive of regular sales can sell the guns without any license. Federal Firearms Act 1938 derives that the manufacturers of the guns must have the authorized license which is received from FFL so that it may reduce the rate of deaths within the country as this checks the background of the people. It is also discussed in the federal law that no one can use the guns near the school premises otherwise the license will be canceled. The interstate firearms transfer will also need to be avoided as is mentioned in the Gun control act of 1968 (Cruz-Ayala, & Megdal, 2020). Assignment tutor said, The red flags and other convictions of the people need to be checked by the FFL before handing the gins to the people. Nebraska law derives that no individual can take loaded guns in vehicles. The individual can carry the loaded shotguns in the vehicle if he has a proper permit or license. The Nebraska law derives that no one who is under the age of 18 cannot carry any shotguns with him. 

The law of Omaha derives that the person must have an identity card to carry the guns openly. The individual must have proper training related to firearms the candidate must have attended the class for 8 hours and must have practiced 2 hours shooting every day to develop the skills. This can only provide permission to carry guns openly in the state. It has been identified that in the year 2017 around 37500 people were died in America due to gunshots. Many people lose their friends, relatives, and many other close people due to gunshots in the US. It is also derived that in the state of Lincoln no individual can use the weapon in a domestic fight then he will receive a big punishment from the government and the government will cancel the license of the gun of that people and will provide him imprisonment. It is also identified that a maximum number of people get murdered in the US due to the selling of guns without any laws. It is also derived by the society to reduce the usage of guns within the public places as the government also need to change the laws in the country regarding the keeping of gun with the people as this increases the death cases within the country and the people fails to maintain a good relationship with one another (Powell, 2018). Protection of lawful commerce arms act 2005 derives that when there will be riots in the country the manufacturers must stop producing the gins and selling in the market to reduce the riots from the country and make the country a peaceful place. It is also derived that the US government needs to implement new laws to reduce the deaths within the country and to reduce the rate of murders which are increasing day by day due to the usage of guns in the country (Bruskotter, et.al. 2018). The president of the country must implement new laws within the country to develop the environment of the country as this will also reduce the number of deaths in the country. The age allocation also needs to be extended as the people who are the age of 18 dont have a stable mind so they can use the guns even in the case of a domestic argument. For eight of the 18 policies, either we found no studies examining the effects on any of the outcomes we considered or the evidence was inconclusive. However, we found some evidence that 10 policies affect one or more of four of the outcomes, as shown below. For example, evidence shows that waiting periods may decrease suicide rates and that concealed-carry laws may increase violent crime. You can also get more information on gun rules apart mentioned above from SourceEssay instant assignment help experts

The Gun Control Act of 1968 (“GCA”) revised the NFA and the FFA, reenacting and expanding upon provisions of the prior acts, and repealing the FFA. The GCA also enacted prohibitions on the importation of firearms “with no sporting purpose.” However, neither the GCA nor any other federal law regulates the domestic manufacture or sale of firearms which would not pass the federal criteria for determining whether a firearm has “a sporting purpose (Sacco, 2019).”However, neither the GCA nor any other federal law regulates the domestic manufacture or sale of firearms which would not pass the federal criteria for determining whether a firearm has “a sporting purpose.” Among the other major provisions of the GCA were the establishment of minimum ages for firearms purchasers, the requirement that all firearms (domestic and imported) be affixed with a serial number, and the expansion of the categories of prohibited persons. A good place to start in seeking effective gun policy is with the evidence. Of course, in an area so contentious, it is difficult to sort out credible research findings.  The debate is typically engaged with anecdotes and slogans. Almost two-thirds of these deaths were suicides. According to a 2016 study by Erin Grinshteyn and David Hemenway, those living in the United States are seven times more likely to die by homicide than if they lived in another wealthy country and are 25 times more likely to die in a gun homicide. We reviewed thousands of studies to identify all available evidence for the effects of 18 gun policies on eight outcomes (Díez, et.al. 2017). After excluding studies that did not meet our criteria for establishing a law’s effects, we found little persuasive evidence for the effects of most policies on most outcomes. There are many Americans who value the tradition of hunting, sport shooting, and collecting guns..and they also appreciate the security and protection that guns give..There are many regions that rely on hunting as an important driver of the tourism economy. And the wider gun industry employs hundreds of thousands of Americans including instructors shooting range operators hunting, equipment suppliers and manufacturer distributors and retailers of firearms and ammunition.

Research paper help specialist also identified that the rules of the US are different from the rules of the UK in the case of keeping the guns with the individuals. It is discussed that the rules which the government of the UK follows are that they have to provide a valid reason to the government before issuing a gun for personal use. The government will check the background of the individual and then the government will provide a gun to that person to utilize for personal use (Eckstein, & Partlow Lefevre, 2017). The government also provides punishment to the individual if they use the guns without any reason and this also results in the cancellation of the license of guns and this may also snatch the gun from the individual. The government also observes whether the person has any criminal record or not and whether the individual harass by any public or not. The government must check every detail of the person before providing him the facility of the gun to use. We also evaluated the views of gun policy experts who have opposing perspectives on the likely effects of gun laws to understand where disagreements exist and where compromise might be possible. Several innovative approaches to shrinking the illicit market are worth serious consideration (Sorenson, & Schut, 2018).  Translating these into new catchy slogans is a new exercise we leave to the readers. It is also researched that a seller can sell weapons without the license if he does not continue the selling regularly. If the person got caught by the government selling guns without a license he will be provided with strict punishment. This is the most effective element which the government of the US needs to maintain to reduce the rate of murder and death from the country to develop the environment of the country and to maintain a peaceful place where the people can lead their life comfortably (Winkler, 2018). The acts of the government need to be followed by the people of the country to avoid the person from purchasing weapons who are criminals in the eye of the country. To know more take instant essay writing help from essay for your assignment writing

Conclusion

The above-discussed essay is regarding the gun laws which the US maintains so that o people face any problem. It is derived in the essay that the people can utilize the gun in any cases to protect them from dangers. It is also derived about the rule of the country that how they control the usage of guns within the country and make the life of the people safe. It is also derived that the country maintains the laws regarding using of gun effectively so that no one face difficulties. It also provided information regarding the age limit from which the individual can keep guns with them. It is also derived that the person who has bad names in the book of laws will not get the license to keep guns with them. If any person caught without the license of the gun he or she will be sent to imprisonment it is also derived in the above essay. It also enumerated the information regarding the checking of background which is mainly performed by the FFL. They check the background of the people that whether they need guns to keep with them or to protect them or not. It is also explained that how the acts which the government of the country maintained to implement peacefulness within the environment of the country also discussed in the above essay. The information related to the number of death cases in the year 2017 was also enumerated in the essay. It also provided information regarding the steps which may reduce the death and murder cases in the US and the people can lead their lifestyle comfortably. It is also discussed the policies of the gun which the country maintains to improve the environment of the country. It also discussed the laws that it is different from the UK.

References

Bjelopera, J. P. (2017). Domestic terrorism: An overview.

Bruskotter, J. T., Vucetich, J. A., Slagle, K. M., Berardo, R., Singh, A. S., & Wilson, R. S. (2018). Support for the US Endangered Species Act over time and space: Controversial species do not weaken public support for protective legislation. Conservation Letters, 11(6), e12595.

Collins, T., Greenberg, R., Siegel, M., Xuan, Z., Rothman, E. F., Cronin, S. W., & Hemenway, D. (2018). State firearm laws and Interstate transfer of guns in the USA, 2006–2016. Journal of urban health, 95(3), 322-336.

Cruz-Ayala, M. B., & Megdal, S. B. (2020). An overview of managed aquifer recharge in Mexico and its legal framework. Water, 12(2), 474.

Díez, C., Kurland, R. P., Rothman, E. F., Bair-Merritt, M., Fleegler, E., Xuan, Z., … & Siegel, M. (2017). State intimate partner violence–related firearm laws and intimate partner homicide rates in the United States, 1991 to 2015. Annals of internal medicine, 167(8), 536-543.

Díez, C., Kurland, R. P., Rothman, E. F., Bair-Merritt, M., Fleegler, E., Xuan, Z., … & Siegel, M. (2017). State intimate partner violence–related firearm laws and intimate partner homicide rates in the United States, 1991 to 2015. Annals of internal medicine, 167(8), 536-543.

Eckstein, J., & Partlow Lefevre, S. T. (2017). Since sandy hook: Strategic maneuvering in the gun control debate. Western journal of communication, 81(2), 225-242.

Hufbauer, G., & Globerman, S. (2018). The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement: Overview and Outlook. Fraser Institute.

Katsiyannis, A., Whitford, D. K., & Ennis, R. P. (2018). Historical Examination of United States Intentional Mass School Shootings in the 20 th and 21 st Centuries: Implications for Students, Schools, and Society. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(8), 2562-2573.

Powell, K. A. (2018). Framing Islam/creating fear: An analysis of US media coverage of terrorism from 2011–2016. Religions, 9(9), 257.

Rocque, M., & Duwe, G. (2018). Rampage shootings: a historical, empirical, and theoretical overview. Current opinion in psychology, 19, 28-33.

Sacco, L. N. (2019). The violence against women act (VAWA): historical overview, funding, and reauthorization. The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA): historical overview, funding, and reauthorization.

Sacco, L. N. (2019). The violence against women act (VAWA): historical overview, funding, and reauthorization. The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA): historical overview, funding, and reauthorization.

Sorenson, S. B., & Schut, R. A. (2018). Nonfatal gun use in intimate partner violence: A systematic review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 19(4), 431-442.

Winkler, A. (2018). Is the Second Amendment Becoming Irrelevant. Ind. LJ, 93, 253.

Open chat
Need Help?
Hello! Welcome to Sourceessay.
How can I help you?